2 Oct 2026
A Summary
I do not use AI text or image generation in my Tetris books or videos.
I provide the proofs below.
A Frustrating Comment on AI
I understand that there is a massive wave of AI paranoia in the masses. However, the fact that an author like me can produce so much work does not mean people can prematurely jump to conclusions or accuse me of AI-generated work without evidence.
Here is evidence for non-AI usage in my other Tetris guides (Book A):
Zoom in with your mouse scroll wheel to see this in the red circle:
Here’s Book 2’s AI scan results:
We might as well AI-scan Book 3 too:
Another (Book 4):
Here is proof that I do not use AI text generation in my Tetris spirituality books either (Books 0 and -1):
Also, my Galactoid Tetris WordPress website has 90% of its guides written before ChatGPT was available. You can check the date of the post here:
Also, AI is not advanced enough to manually create all my 10,000+ Tetris diagrams like this:
If you ask AI to generate Tetris pictures, you get nonsensical fields with pentaminoes and non-Tetris pieces (try it yourself!).
Most importantly, AI trains by feeding on the internet. My Galactoid Tetris WordPress website’s guides were written long before ChatGPT.
If you use AI to generate a Tetris book, it will just cite my guides, which are the source of a lot of Tetris knowledge!
Here is what I mean. Just use any AI and check the source:
Lastly, the fact that there are actual human errors on my errata page shows that everything was human-crafted:
Even the book covers’ props’ original base was laboriously hand-crafted by me:
Ah, let us scan my YouTube tutorial videos, too:
Please Respect my Human Creations
Please do not accuse authors prematurely of using AI; it is very disrespectful towards actual human writers who spend hundreds of hours laboriously crafting every word.
True human writers like me have to survive in an ocean full of other authors who use generative AI for everything.
I wrote this page because I got 3 premature AI accusations in a single week, by ignorant people who just take the easier path of jumping to conclusions instead of verifying themselves.
You may wonder how I have written over 3,000 pages of Tetris guides and 6,500 pages of fiction in other books. Here is the reason:
I am just that productive and efficient.
I have the innate capacity to process vast amounts of information efficiently. For instance, I can read a book and, years later, if I read something similar, map the earlier book’s patterns onto the new one and integrate them seamlessly.
This happened across the thousands of books and videos I have read or watched.
That is how I can write books without referring to any sources. I write directly from memory (except to verify critical definitions or cite exact references).
AI Used Only for Fact-Checking, Error Detection, Formatting, Calculations, and Marketing
The only time AI was used was for the following non-AI-generative purposes:
i) Fact-checking: Pasting the chapters into some AIs to ask them to flag errors (like my Tetris spirituality book confusing the USSR’s collectivism implementation date in the 1950s).
ii) Error detection: Pasting the chapters into some AIs to flag grammatical or typographical errors. No AI-assisted editing was used (I do not ask the AI to rewrite for me). I asked the AI to bolden errors and give suggested changes, which I manually edited in my work in Microsoft Word.
iii) Formatting and Polishing: Bibliography or footnotes were sometimes reformatted by the AI in the correct formatting style (APA, ASA, MLA, etc.). This was most useful for the required citation format in the footnotes and bibliographies of the Tetris spirituality books.
iv) Recalculations: Some Tetris probabilities and concepts (like Parity) required a lot of manual checking. I used DeepSeek’s DeepThink to verify my calculations and provide external validation.
v) Grammar Software: I use both Grammarly Premium and ProWritingAid Premium to provide another layer of checks. I do not use the “rephrase” rewrite function. Traditional publishers are known to reject AI-assisted editing, but using Grammarly and ProWritingAid is an allowed industry standard and is not considered AI text generation.
vi) Administrative, Non-Creative Matters: AI was used to ensure that some of the book blurbs or marketing on this website (which are not in the books) meet the requirements (such as an ideal 150 to 220 word count and blurb structure with hooks and closure).
None of these involve AI text or image generation within the books or my guides.
An Update
The AI-accusers have since been converted into toes on my fungus-infested, sweaty feet:
(The tragic end? Stay tuned to find out; more on Galactoid Radio F25, where Tetris reigns!)
